David Sundman forwarded this blog post on economic lessons from old coins. Thanks. These are no secrets to numismatists, but it's nice to see
the topics addressed outside our field. -Editor
Recently, I added a few coins with curious histories to my modest collection, leading to a podcast interview by my Mercatus Center
colleague and monetary expert David Beckworth on a "Monetary History of Small Coins." A few highlights of that discussion include: a Roman coin from
the reign of Diocletian (A.D. 284-305), an English groat (fourpence piece) from the reign of Henry VII (1485-1509), and several oddball American
pieces that sprang up during 19th century coin shortages.
Economics aside, numismatics (the study of coins and currency) has a romantic side. My Diocletian piece traveled for 1,700 years before reaching
me. Who, I wonder, owned it during those centuries, and what did they buy with it?
Romance aside, fourth-century Roman coinage offers cautionary tales for 21st-century lawmakers. The value of Roman coins stemmed from their
precious metal content - silver, bronze and so forth. Leading up to Diocletian, Roman authorities had debased the currency little by little by
diminishing the metallic value of each coin. This way, they could use less silver, for example, to make more coins to fund the Empire. Merchants
demanded more and more of the cheapened coins for their goods and services.
Like so many rulers then and now, Diocletian blamed this inflation on greedy merchants, profiteers, speculators. In A.D. 301, he issued his Edict
on Maximum Prices, imposing price limits on more than 1,000 goods. Any merchants who charged more and the consumers who paid those inflated prices
could both receive the death penalty. Supply and demand, however, proved mightier than Diocletian's threats. Romans largely ignored the Edict, and
Henry VII's groat (fourpence) represents something of the opposite story. This piece, dating from the late 1400s, was nearly identical to one
first issued under Edward III (1351). Other than the monarch's name, the design and metallic content remained virtually unchanged through eight more
kings, including Henry VII. Currency stability played a significant role in England's rise from a small island on the edge of civilization to
history's most extensive empire. Henry VIII's "Great Debasement" was an exception, earning him, for amusing reasons, the sobriquet "Old
Several times in American history, small coins became scarce, leaving Americans struggling to manage small transactions. Shortages usually
occurred when inflation made the metallic value of coins more valuable than the face value. During the Civil War, for example, war finance and
military demand for metal made melted American coins more valuable than the denominations stamped on unmelted pieces. (Many were hidden rather than
If you were trying to get through life, your smallest change might have been a one-dollar bill - worth close to $25 in today's money. If you
needed a loaf of bread or a streetcar ride, too bad. You wouldn't have the change, and neither would the baker nor the driver. A variety of
alternatives to coins sprang up. Postage stamps were encased in disks and used as coins. Stores issued metal or wooden tokens promising, say, "5¢ in
trade." And most curiously, privately issued Civil War tokens resembling pennies appeared, bearing patriotic slogans like "Union Forever." Civil War
tokens, like today's U.S. currency, promised nothing to bearers, but were nonetheless widely accepted until they were outlawed.
To read the complete article, see:
Timeless Lessons From Old Money
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: firstname.lastname@example.org
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2012 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster